成唯識論演祕 3.479

3.479

詳曰：因明之法，宗、因、喻三若有過者，容致言簡，為論文略疏致許言。復云心所亦通於下，明遮喻、因，過乃盡矣，何事見責？

Detailed analysis: In the rules of Buddhist logic (hetuvidyā), if the thesis, reason, or example contains a fault, it is permissible to introduce qualifying terms. Because the text of the Treatise is concise, the Commentary provides the qualifying word 'admitted'. It also states that 'mental factor' likewise applies below; by clarifying the exclusion of the example and reason, faults are completely eliminated. Why should it be rebuked?