成唯識論演祕 3.509

3.509

詳曰：傍觀二義，義皆有餘，想不起說，論云何說方能隨起種種名言？方能之言，何所詮屬？雖分麁細，不簡親疎，豈麁細因皆親起語，故名不修？由此應依《樞要》、《燈》說。

I examine: Looking at both positions from the sidelines, both meanings are incomplete. If ideation does not give rise to speech, why does the Treatise state, 'only then can it subsequently give rise to various nominal designations'? To what does the phrase 'only then can' refer? Although they are distinguished as gross and subtle, they do not distinguish between direct and indirect; can both gross and subtle causes directly issue speech so that the terminology would be flawed? Consequently, one should rely on the explanations in the Shuyao and the Deng.