成唯識論演祕 3.554

3.554

詳曰：今觀此質與難不齊，難前意云，觸雖不與自觸相應，有餘相應例相應門；行相雖復了別等別，然亦各各自有行相，亦復不闕行相之義，何不例王行相門耶？今者受數全不與受而得相應，與行相應義寬狹別，何得以此而質於彼？

Examination: Observing this interrogation now, it does not match the objection. The intention of the earlier objection was: although contact does not associate with contact itself, it has other associations, so it is brought in by parallel under the rubric of association; although the mental aspects are distinct as cognition and so forth, nevertheless each also has its own mental aspect and does not lack the meaning of mental aspect, so why is it not made parallel to the rubric of the mental aspects of the primary mind? Now, the mental factor of feeling does not associate with feeling at all; the meanings of association with feeling and [association with] mental aspects differ in being broader or narrower, so how can one use this to interrogate the other?