成唯識論演祕 3.838

3.838

答：如數論師對佛法者說我是思，雖佛法中許有假我，彼不分別，意談思我，故所別過；此類亦然，故有法失。

Answer: Just as when a Sāṃkhya states to a Buddhist that the self is consciousness (cetanā)—although Buddhism accepts a nominal self, the Sāṃkhya does not make that distinction and intends the self as consciousness, which is the fallacy of the qualificand (viśeṣya-doṣa)—the present case is similar, and thus there is the fault regarding the subject.