成唯識論演祕 3.842

3.842

有義：若言此破彼救令同外道者，自宗依他亦非實有，二失既同，如何偏責？故今別解。外道毀謗但言非實，不為全無，非大邪見，汝今說無成大邪見，釋成大邪見不是破救也。

There is an opinion: If one says that this refutes their defense and equates them with non-Buddhists, the other-dependent nature (paratantra) of our own school is also not substantially real. Since both incur the same fault, why reproach only them? Therefore, another explanation is now given: When non-Buddhists make denigrations, they merely say it is not real; they do not consider it to be entirely non-existent, and this is not a great wrong view. You now speak of it as non-existent, which constitutes a great wrong view; this explains 'becoming of great wrong view' and is not a refutation of their defense.