成唯識論演祕 3.846

3.846

答：為二釋。一、難非實，不責其無，即次論云不謂全無，但執非實，故知彼宗世俗雖有而非實也。不爾，便有他隨一過。二、就勝義，本被資糧極歸真諦，真諦即無，資糧何用。

Answer: There are two explanations. First, it objects to them being non-real, not reproaching their total absence. That is why the subsequent text says 'it is not considered total non-existence, but merely clinging to non-reality'; hence we know that although they exist conventionally in their school, they are not real. Otherwise, there would be the fault of unaccepted by the opponent (anyatara-asiddha). Second, from the perspective of ultimate truth: provisions are originally undertaken to culminate in the ultimate truth; if the ultimate truth is non-existent, what use are the provisions?