成唯識論演祕 3.862

3.862

詳曰：餘釋及斷理皆有餘，豈無心後身識起時無覺勞適？若爾，云何唯約定中有識，而說五識理得因緣變收？影像之觸云何無用？若言五識是分別變，便違正理，如前具辨。

Critical assessment: The other explanation and this judgement both leave something to be desired. Could it be that when body-consciousness arises after a mindless [state], there is no awareness of fatigue or comfort? If so, why is it said only with regard to consciousness during meditative absorption, while stating that the five consciousnesses logically fall under transformation by causal conditions (hetu-pratyaya)? Why would the image-tangible be useless? If one says that the five consciousnesses are transformations of conceptual discrimination, this contradicts correct reasoning, as fully discriminated before.