成唯識論演祕 3.919

3.919

此解意云：前難意者不可無漏能持有漏，餘二能持有漏之法。既是有漏，識應同彼，難三性意，義亦同前。豈可以將三性等難？乘難壽等一切合同？

The meaning of this explanation is: the previous challenge intended that uncontaminated states cannot sustain contaminated ones, whereas the other two are phenomena that can sustain contaminated ones. Since they are contaminated, consciousness should be identical to them. The intent of challenging the three natures is also the same as before. How could one take the challenge regarding the three natures and the like, and take advantage of the challenge against lifespan and the like to make all things identical?