成唯識論演祕 4.156

4.156

詳曰：雖本欲明心等所依，及列釋中據寬立號。何以明者？即此論云：諸有為法皆託此依，故知據遍。若唯約心，何不說云諸心、心所皆託此依，言諸有為？又疏若云三依一一攝因緣盡，可如所責，但云初依依寬立號，何得以彼增上緣例？故知疏斷實無其咎。

Examination: Although the original intent was to clarify the bases of citta and so on, in listing and explaining them, the designation is established on broad grounds. How is this demonstrated? This Treatise itself states: 'All conditioned dharmas rely on this basis'; thus it is known to be based on universality. If it were solely regarding citta, why did it not say 'all citta and caitasika dharmas rely on this basis', instead of saying 'all conditioned [dharmas]'? Furthermore, if the Commentary had said that each of the three bases subsumes all causes-as-conditions, it could be reproached as claimed; but it merely states that the first basis is named on broad grounds, so how can it be paralleled with that predominant condition? Therefore it is known that the Commentary's conclusion is truly without fault.