成唯識論演祕 4.159

4.159

詳曰：濫有親疎，親難辨故可須簡之，疎者易知不假分別。故下淨月種、現相例為俱有也。又疏但明兩俱寬狡，對望有差，何處有顯慈尊過處，搆虛指斥？

I examine this and say: Overextensions have proximate and remote forms. Because the proximate is difficult to distinguish, it must be excluded; the remote is easily known and does not require discrimination. Therefore, Śuddhacandra below analogizes seeds and actual states to each other as co-existent. Furthermore, the Commentary merely clarifies that both [usages] are broad and loose, having differences relative to what they are viewed against; where does it show fault in the Venerable Maitreya, fabricating falsity and pointing blame?