成唯識論演祕 4.53

4.53

詳曰：疏既云汝，明簡斯失？不爾，汝言復何所用？下第四量雖亦破之，亦同此釋。

We evaluate: Since the Commentary already states 'your [view]', does it not clearly eliminate this error? Otherwise, what purpose would the word 'your' serve? Although the fourth syllogism below is also refuted, it is explained in the same way.