成唯識論演祕 4.623

4.623

據《無性論》此文雙破經部、上座亦應無失。故彼論云：經部所立色為意識俱生別依，此不成就，不應道理。以就思擇、隨念分別，應一切時無分別故。傳釋云：肉摶心藏四塵色法，為意識依。又云：由此道理餘部所立胸中色物，意識別依，亦不成就。釋類破上座，同是色故。故此論初含於兩宗，後破經部，理應允矣。

According to Asabhāva's treatise, this passage refuting both the Sautrāntikas and the Sthaviras should also be without error. Thus, that treatise says: 'The Sautrāntika position that form is the distinct co-arisen support of mental consciousness is unestablished and unreasonable, because in terms of deliberative and recollective conceptualization, it would follow that at all times there would be no conceptualization.' A transmitted explanation says: 'The physical lump of the heart made of the four dusts of form is the support for mental consciousness.' It also says: 'By this reasoning, what other schools establish as the material substance in the chest being the distinct support of mental consciousness is also unestablished.' The explanation analogously refutes the Sthaviras, because both are material form. Therefore, this treatise initially encompasses both schools, and later refutes the Sautrāntikas; the reasoning should be accepted.