成唯識論演祕 4.739

4.739

此答前問，總有兩解。散意入捨至耳必不生，是第一解。二解雖復至其性亦許有不同，是第二解。就第一解復有二意，一、入捨定；二、初起定。起定即是將出定時，此二時意與耳同緣。

This answers the preceding question and has two explanations in total. From "The distracted mind enters equanimity" up to "auditory consciousness definitely does not arise" is the first explanation. The second explanation is from "Although it also..." up to "their nature is also permitted to differ." Regarding the first explanation, there are again two intentions: first, entering the concentration of equanimity; second, when first arising from concentration. Arising from concentration means when about to emerge from concentration. At these two times, the mind perceives the same object as the auditory consciousness.