成唯識論演祕 5.397

5.397

亦有本云如前全常，疏既不同，略為三釋：一、應云「如何」，「如何」即是隨何之義，隨何全常皆有自我；二、應云「如四」，如四全常中皆有自我；三、應云「如前」，如前常言結指前也。三皆有理。應從多本。

There are also manuscripts that read: 'as the previously [mentioned] completely eternal'. Since the Commentary's reading is different, we briefly provide three explanations: First, it should read 'how' (ruhe), 'how' bearing the meaning of 'whichever' (suihe)—whichever is completely eternal, it always has a self; second, it should read 'as the four' (ru si)—as in the four completely eternal ones, all have a self; third, it should read 'as the previous' (ru qian)—as the previous word 'eternal' concludes by pointing back to the preceding. All three are reasonable. One should follow the majority of manuscripts.