成唯識論演祕 5.480

5.480

諸論辨此相應不同，今略引之。〈五十五〉云：無明與一切疑都無所有，貪、嗔不相應，此或與慢、見，謂染愛時，或高舉，或推求。如染愛、憎恚亦爾。慢之與見、我更相應，謂高舉時，邪復推構。〈五十八〉云：五見是惠性故，互不相應，自性自性不相應故。貪、恚、慢、疑更相違故，互不相應。貪染令心卑下；憍慢令心高舉，是故貪、慢更互相違。《對法》第六云：貪不與嗔相應，一向相違，法必不俱故。又，貪不與疑相應，由惠於境不決定，必無染著故，餘得相應。如貪、嗔亦爾，謂嗔不與貪、慢、見相應，若於此事起憎恚，即不於此生於高舉及推求。與餘相應，如理應知，慢不與嗔、疑相應。無明有二：相應、不共。不共不與嗔、疑相應；疑不與貪、慢、見相應。會如此論及《疏》，故不重云。

The treatises differ in distinguishing these associations; I now cite them briefly. Fascicle 55 says: Ignorance has no association whatsoever with all [forms of] doubt, and does not associate with greed or anger; this may associate with conceit and views, meaning that at the time of defiled love, there is either haughtiness or deduction. Just as defiled love is, so too is hatred. Conceit and views or self further associate with each other, meaning that at the time of haughtiness, there is further erroneous construction. Fascicle 58 says: Because the five views are of the nature of wisdom (prajñā), they do not associate with one another, because one intrinsic nature does not associate with its own intrinsic nature. Because greed, hostility, conceit, and doubt mutually conflict, they do not associate with each other: greed and defilement cause the mind to be lowly, whereas arrogance and conceit cause the mind to be haughty; therefore greed and conceit mutually conflict. Fascicle 6 of the Abhidharmasamuccaya says: Greed does not associate with anger, because they are entirely contradictory and dharmas necessarily cannot coexist. Furthermore, greed does not associate with doubt, because through wisdom's indecisiveness regarding the object, there is definitely no defiled attachment; it can associate with the rest. Just as greed is, so too is anger, meaning that anger does not associate with greed, conceit, or views: if one gives rise to hatred toward this matter, one does not give rise to haughtiness and deduction toward this [same matter]. It associates with the rest, as should be understood in accordance with reason. Conceit does not associate with anger or doubt. Ignorance is of two kinds: conjoined and unshared. Unshared [ignorance] does not associate with anger or doubt; doubt does not associate with greed, conceit, or views. This has been reconciled in this Treatise and its Commentary, so it will not be repeated.