成唯識論演祕 5.586

5.586

有義《疏》說是同，今解有別。慢、見六同，貪、嗔二種，〈五十九〉文從多分故，唯名有事。《對法》盡理與見、慢俱，亦名無事。然疑一種，《瑜伽》盡理，說通二種。《對法》既云與見、慢俱，方名無事，疑非彼俱，不通無事，故理不盡。無明一種，二論無違。

An opinion states: The Commentary says they are identical; our present explanation holds that they differ. Conceit and the six views are identical. As for craving and anger, the text of chapter 59 speaks according to the majority, so it names them only as having real facts; the Abhidharmasamuccaya-bhāṣya, in an exhaustive account, states that when coexisting with views and conceit, they are also called without real facts. However, regarding the single affliction of doubt, the Yogācārabhūmi exhaustively states that it applies to both types; since the Abhidharmasamuccaya-bhāṣya says that only when coexisting with views and conceit is it called without real facts, and doubt does not coexist with them, it does not apply to being without real facts, and thus its reasoning is not exhaustive. Regarding the single affliction of ignorance, the two treatises do not conflict.