成唯識論演祕 6.105

6.105

詳曰：本明滅定要斷見惑而方得起，故說異生不能伏滅見道煩惱，顯彼不得；今者乃云不伏彼善，說之何為？與論文意殊不相當。又辨見惑，如何以彼有頂修惑未滅為難，而細被之便成可咲？餘過思之。

We evaluate this as follows: It was originally explained that the attainment of extinction requires severing the afflictions of seeing before it can arise; hence it was said that worldlings cannot subdue and extinguish the afflictions of the path of seeing, to show that they cannot attain it. Now to claim that it means not subduing those wholesome [cittas]—why speak of that? It is completely inconsistent with the intent of the treatise's text. Moreover, when distinguishing the afflictions of seeing, how could one object using the unextinguished afflictions of cultivation in the Peak of Existence? Scrutinizing this makes it laughable. Consider its other errors.