成唯識論演祕 6.194

6.194

有義彈云：身不定難，如何得說通非情耶？若言情、非情境於多相續皆不定屬，說通非情；此亦不然，境通非情仍約有情，名不定故，故應思之。

Some criticize this, saying: In the objection regarding the non-determination of embodiment, how can it be said to be general to the insentient? If one says that both sentient and insentient objects are not determinately bound to multiple mental continuities (saṃtāna), and on that basis says it is general to the insentient, this is also incorrect; for even though the object is general to the insentient, it is still designated as 'non-determinate' in reference to sentient beings. Therefore, this should be considered.