成唯識論演祕 6.520

6.520

有義彈云：五蘊三性為此支者，如何得引此論第二復次說耶？別說五支既唯異熟，明知總攝不通三性，何得為證通攝三性？

An opinion criticizes: If the five aggregates of the three natures constitute this link, how can one cite the second alternative explanation of this Treatise? Since the five links when explained separately are exclusively maturation, it is clear that their collective subsumption does not encompass the three natures; how can it serve as proof for collectively subsuming the three natures?