成唯識論演祕 6.668

6.668

詳曰：唯約能緣，何非善通？雖下第七能緣縛在能所緣狹，然欲善等從寬而說云斷，何失？若以緣雜唯依六識，緣、雜二種攝法不盡，第七煩惱非二攝故。若言緣、雜攝彼七識善等，而言離緣、雜者，唯據六識，若爾，何妨緣雜之言目七識惑？欲善等斷，據彼能緣寬者無說。由斯，《疏》旨理固無違。

Detailed analysis: Why is it not well resolved if formulated solely in terms of that which grasps the objective support? Although the grasping-support bondage of the lower seventh consciousness remains, its grasping and its object-support are narrow; however, what fault is there in speaking of abandonment of desire-realm wholesome [dharmas] and so forth in a broad sense? If objective-support and interspersing were based exclusively on the six consciousnesses, then the two kinds—objective-support and interspersing—would not exhaustively subsume all dharmas, because the defilements of the seventh consciousness would not be subsumed by either. If one says that objective-support and interspersing subsume the wholesome [dharmas] and so forth of the seventh consciousness, but states that freedom from objective-support and interspersing is based solely on the six consciousnesses—if so, what prevents the words "objective-support" and "interspersing" from denoting the defilements of the seventh consciousness? The abandonment of desire-realm wholesome [dharmas] and so forth is spoken of on the basis of the broader cognitive grasp being absent. Therefore, the purport of the Commentary is fundamentally without contradiction.