成唯識論演祕 7.135

7.135

答：謂四聖諦。既後智境亦名真實，故知後得所緣四諦真如等相皆名真實。然三十六第三真實具言三智；第四不具，但影顯也。不爾，何意有具、不具？或取《疏》、傳合今所明，復為一釋。故《大論》前後亦不相違，更思。

Answer: It refers to the four noble truths. Since the realm of subsequent cognition is also named reality, we know that the marks of the four truths, suchness, etc., taken as ālambana by subsequent attainment, are all named reality. However, the third reality in fascicle thirty-six fully mentions the three cognitions; the fourth does not fully state it, but only indicates it implicitly. Otherwise, why would one be complete and the other incomplete? Or, by combining the Commentary and the transmission with what is clarified here, it forms yet another explanation. Therefore, the earlier and later parts of the Great Treatise do not contradict each other either; reflect on this further.