成唯識論演祕 7.151

7.151

《疏》有兩釋。初釋意云：由能執心執於我、法，而熏成種。種雖有體，由因遍計所執我、法，能計心等熏成於種，種名初性；非是別熏所執之種。或能遍計假名所執，所熏之種從能熏心假名初性。第二意云：為能執心執彼習氣，為所遍計；習熏是彼所執所依，從彼能依假名所執。

The Commentary has two explanations. The intention of the first explanation is: Due to the grasping mind clinging to self and dharmas, it perfuses and produces seeds. Although seeds have real substance, because they are perfumed and produced by the calculating mind and so forth on the basis of the imagined self and dharmas, the seeds are termed the first nature; it is not that distinct seeds of what is imagined are perfumed. Or alternatively, the active imagination is metaphorically termed the imagined [object], and the seeds perfumed thereby are metaphorically termed the first nature by association with the perfuming mind. The second intention is: The grasping mind clings to those vasanas as the object of its imagination; the vasana-perfuming is the locus of that grasping, and is metaphorically termed the imagined [nature] on the basis of that which depends on it.