成唯識論演祕 7.351

7.351

《疏》有兩釋，不斷優劣。今觀二釋，理猶難悟，何所以者？三乘真見皆非安立，如何二乘方便安立引非安立？如前不許以執導空，以異類故。若許作者，復違此文。

The Commentary offers two interpretations without judging which is superior. Examining both interpretations now, the principle remains difficult to comprehend. Why is this so? The genuine vision of all three vehicles is unestablished; how could the expedient, established [contemplation] of the two vehicles induce the unestablished? As stated before, using grasping to lead to emptiness is not accepted because they are of different categories. If this were permitted, it would again contradict this text.