成唯識論演祕 7.647

7.647

如《疏》具辨《攝論》、《中邊》與此同、異。有義自釋，復彈《疏》云：初應正同世親所說，義無別故。無性後釋亦與此同，不可如《疏》說此、彼別。

As the Commentary fully analyzes the similarities and differences between the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, the Madhyāntavibhāga, and this [Treatise]: One opinion gives its own interpretation and again criticizes the Commentary, saying: The beginning should be precisely identical to Vasubandhu's explanation, because the meaning is not different. Asabhāva's subsequent explanation is also identical to this; they should not be said to differ between this and that as in the Commentary.