唯識二十論述記 2.264

2.264

述曰：此申難也。夢時與覺，無境是同，覺時與夢，俱造眾業，何故覺行感果苦楚，或有現報等，夢時造行感果微劣，或無果等？如夢殺人定無現在為他報殺，若覺時殺，定為現在他人殺報，未來感果故定不同。如殺他人、婬他人等餘一切行，其果亦爾。此外人質以問論主。

Commentary: This presents the objection: Dreams and waking are identical in lacking objects, and in both waking and dreaming, all kinds of karma are performed. Why is it that waking actions produce painful results or even present retribution and so forth, whereas actions performed in dreams produce slight and inferior results or no results at all? For example, killing a person in a dream definitely incurs no present retribution of being killed by another, whereas if one kills while awake, one will definitely incur the present retribution of being killed by another; thus the future results experienced must certainly be different. As with killing another, committing sexual misconduct with another, and all other actions, their results are likewise. This is the opponent challenging the treatise master with an inquiry.