唯識二十論述記 2.79

2.79

述曰：上來二頌，破諸極微有合、無合二俱不成。自下一頌，破外極微有分、無分二俱不成。於中有三：初發論端，生不成理；次外返徵；後舉頌下，正顯不成。發論端中，初結於前有合、無合；後正生下，有、無分失。此結於前合、無合也。汝宗所許一實極微，汝許相合及不相合，其過且如我所說爾，結上所明，捨不論也。

The Commentary says: The preceding two verses refuted both conjunction and non-conjunction of paramāṇus as unestablished. The following verse refutes both possessing parts and lacking parts for the opponent's paramāṇu as unestablished. Herein there are three parts: first, the treatise's opening introduces the reason for non-establishment; next, the opponent interrogates in return; finally, the verse below is cited to demonstrate non-establishment directly. In introducing the topic, it first concludes the preceding conjunction and non-conjunction; then it introduces the subsequent faults of possessing and lacking parts. This concludes the preceding conjunction and non-conjunction. For the single real paramāṇu accepted in your school, whether you accept that they conjoin or do not conjoin, the faults are just as I have explained, concluding what was clarified above and setting it aside without further discussion.