大乘百法明門論疏 2.27

2.27

第五、將餘五位對隨煩惱，約義有無，以明廢立，具一闕四，入隨煩惱，餘法不爾，非隨煩惱。遍行五法，但為通三性，遍九地，亦相續，復俱起，復非隨惑，五義不同，非隨煩惱攝。別境五法，雖非相續，亦非俱起，但為通於三性，亦遍九地，非隨煩惱，三義不同，非隨煩惱。善十一法，雖非通三性，亦非相續，復非俱起，但為非遍九地，非隨煩惱，二義不同，非隨煩惱。煩惱六法，雖非通三性，非遍九地，亦非相續，復非俱起，但為非隨煩惱，一義不同，非隨煩惱。不定四法，雖非遍九地，亦非相續，復非俱起，但為通三性，非隨煩惱，二義不同，非隨煩惱。

Fifth, contrasting the other five categories with the upakleśas to clarify establishment and exclusion in terms of the presence or absence of characteristics: Those that possess one and lack four are included among the upakleśas; the other dharmas are not so, and thus are not upakleśas. The five sarvatraga dharmas, merely because they are common to the three natures, pervade the nine planes, are continuous, arise together, and moreover are not upakleśa defilements—these five characteristics being different—are not subsumed under the upakleśas. Although the five viniyata dharmas are neither continuous nor arise together, merely because they are common to the three natures, pervade the nine planes, and are not upakleśas—these three characteristics being different—are not upakleśas. Although the eleven kuśala dharmas are not common to the three natures, and are neither continuous nor arise together, merely because they do not pervade the nine planes and are not upakleśas—these two characteristics being different—are not upakleśas. Although the six kleśa dharmas are not common to the three natures, do not pervade the nine planes, and are neither continuous nor arise together, merely because they are not upakleśas—one characteristic being different—are not upakleśas. Although the four aniyata dharmas do not pervade the nine planes, and are neither continuous nor arise together, merely because they are common to the three natures and are not upakleśas—these two characteristics being different—are not upakleśas.