因明入正理論疏 3.121

3.121

述曰：第二指體。宗、因如前，此中不舉，但標似異所立不遣。此類非一，隨明於一，故云且也。或不具詞，似五明一，故亦云且。

The Commentary states: The second is pointing out its concrete form. The thesis and reason are as before; they are not raised here, but it merely indicates the pseudo-heterogeneous non-exclusion of the probandum. Instances of this kind are not singular; explaining just one of them as it occurs, it says 'for example'. Or, the expression being non-exhaustive, explaining one among the five fallacies, it likewise says 'for example'.