因明入正理論疏 3.219

3.219

述曰：下釋。如先所說四不成、六不定、四相違，及其似喻，皆生似智因，並名似因。前已廣明，恐繁故指。准標有智及因，今釋亦有所知之因及能知智，皆不正故，俱名似因。然釋文無，即舉因顯，用彼因智以為先因。准理標中亦合云：「若似因智，及邪憶彼所立宗因不相離念為先。」文略故爾。釋文隨標，亦略不說。

The commentary says: Below is the explanation. As explained previously, the four unestablished (asiddha), the six inconclusive (anaikāntika), the four contradictory (viruddha), along with their pseudo-examples, are all reasons that produce pseudo-cognition; they are all called pseudo-reasons. Since they have been explained extensively before, he points to them here to avoid prolixity. In accordance with the initial definition which had both cognition and reason, the explanation now also includes both the reason to be known and the cognising cognition, and because both are improper, both are called pseudo-reasons. However, as it is omitted in the explanatory text, he simply adduces the reason to indicate it, taking the cognition of that reason as the preceding cause. According to principle, the initial definition should also have stated: 'If preceded by the cognition of a pseudo-reason, and the erroneous recollection of the inseparability of the proposed thesis and reason.' It is merely due to textual brevity that it is stated this way. The explanatory text follows the initial definition and likewise abbreviates without stating it.