因明入正理論疏 3.236

3.236

述曰：下結似能破名辯釋所以。於中分二：即結名及釋。此即初也。如是者，指前之詞。言說者，即圓滿能立缺減言等，如此等言，名為似破。問：「何故於圓滿能立，顯示缺減性言等，為似能破？」

The Commentary states: Below is the conclusion naming apparent refutation and explaining the reason. Within this, there are two parts: concluding the name and the explanation. This is the first. 'Such' is a term referring to what precedes. 'Statements' are words alleging deficiency with respect to a complete proof, and so forth. Statements such as these are named apparent refutation. Question: Why are words showing incompleteness with respect to a complete proof, and so forth, considered apparent refutations?