因明入正理論疏 3.70

3.70

問：「若因無依，喻是何過？」答：「若因依無，即不成因，因體非有，即是喻中所依不成。」

Question: 'If the reason lacks a substratum, what fallacy is it for the example?' Answer: 'If the substratum of the reason is absent, it then fails to be a reason; the entity of the reason does not exist, which is precisely unestablished substratum (āśrayāsiddha) in the example.'