因明入正理論疏 3.75

3.75

問：「喻既依因，舉彼瓶等欲何所用？」答：「所依有二：一自體依、二所助依。瓶自體依，因所助依。一云：盡理而言，准論但約自體辯依，據兩俱、隨一但望喻依，不可說言無礙因上，兩俱、隨一不許無礙。但於喻依，許不許故。此說為善，順論文故。」

Question: 'Since the example relies on the reason, what is the purpose of adducing that pot and the like?' Answer: 'Substrata are of two kinds: 1. the substratum of its own nature (svabhāvāśraya); 2. the substratum of what is aided. The pot is the substratum of its own nature; the reason is the substratum of what is aided. One says: speaking exhaustively of the principle, according to the treatise, it only analyzes the substratum in terms of its own nature; looking at unestablished for both and unestablished for one, it is solely with respect to the substratum of the example; it cannot be said that on the immaterial reason, unestablished for both and unestablished for one do not accept immateriality. It is solely whether one accepts or does not accept with respect to the substratum of the example. This statement is excellent, because it conforms to the text of the treatise.'