Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

起信論疏 1.6

起信論疏 1.6

Language
Classical Chinese

1.6

將說此論,略有三門:初標宗體、次釋題名,其第三者依文顯義。第一標宗體者,然夫大乘之為體也,蕭焉空寂、湛爾沖玄,玄之又玄之,豈出萬像之表;寂之又寂之,猶在百家之談。非像表也,五眼不能見其軀;在言裏也,四辯不能談其狀。欲言大矣,入無內而莫遺;欲言微矣,苞無外而有餘。引之於有,一如用之而空;獲之於無,萬物乘之而生。不知何以言之,強號之謂大乘。自非杜口大士、目擊丈夫,誰能論大乘於離言、起深信於絕慮者哉。所以馬鳴菩薩無緣大悲,傷彼無明妄風動心海而易漂、愍此本覺真性睡長夢而難悟,於是同體智力堪造此論,贊述如來深經奧義,欲使為學者暫開一軸遍探三藏之旨、為道者永息萬境遂還一心之原。所述雖廣,可略而言,開二門於一心,總括摩羅百八之廣誥;示性淨於相染,普綜踰闍十五之幽致。至如鵠林一味之宗、鷲山無二之趣,《金鼓》、《同性》三身之極果、《華嚴》、《瓔珞》四階之深因,《大品》、《大集》曠蕩之至道、《日藏》、《月藏》微密之玄門,凡此等輩中眾典之肝心一以貫之者,其唯此論乎。故下文言「為欲總攝如來廣大深法無邊義故,應說此論。」此論之意既其如是,開則無量無邊之義為宗、合則二門一心之法為要,二門之內容萬義而不亂、無邊之義同一心而混融,是以開合自在、立破無礙,開而不繁、合而不狹,立而無得、破而無失,是為馬鳴之妙術、《起信》之宗體也。然以此論意趣深邃,從來釋者尠具其宗,良由各守所習而牽文,不能虛懷而尋旨,所以不近論主之意,或望源而迷流、或把葉而亡幹、或割領而補袖、或折枝而帶根。今直依此論文,屬當所述經本,庶同趣者消息之耳。標宗體竟。

To explain this treatise, there are summarily three gates: first, indicating the essential doctrine; second, explaining the title; third, elucidating the meaning following the text. As for the first, indicating the essential doctrine: Now, as for the essence of the Mahāyāna, it is serene and quiescent, clear and profoundly abstruse. Profound beyond profound, how could it emerge beyond the myriad forms? Silent beyond silent, it is still within the discourses of the hundred schools. It is not outside forms, yet the five eyes cannot see its body; it is within words, yet the fourfold eloquence cannot describe its shape. If one wishes to call it great, it enters where there is no interior without leaving anything behind; if one wishes to call it subtle, it encompasses where there is no exterior with room to spare. Draw it into existence, and identical with tathatā, its function is empty; find it in nonexistence, and the myriad things ride upon it and are born. Not knowing how to name it, one forcefully terms it the Mahāyāna. If one is not a great being who closes his mouth or a master of direct insight, who could discuss the Mahāyāna beyond words, or awaken deep faith beyond thought? Therefore Bodhisattva Aśvaghoṣa, moved by unconditioned mahākaruṇā, grieved that the delusive wind of avidyā stirs the ocean of mind so easily into drift, and pitied this true nature of original enlightenment sleeping in a long dream difficult to awaken from. Thereupon, by the power of wisdom of identical essence, he was able to compose this treatise, extolling and expounding the profound sūtras and esoteric meanings of the Tathāgata, desiring to cause students momentarily to open a single scroll and comprehensively explore the purport of the Tripiṭaka, and to cause practitioners eternally to rest from the myriad objects and finally return to the source of the One Mind. Although what it expounds is vast, it can be stated briefly: opening the two gates within the One Mind, it summarises the broad declarations of the hundred and eight questions of the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra; showing nature-purity within phenomenal defilement, it comprehensively synthesises the fifteen profound purports of the Yuqie. As for the single-taste doctrine of the Crane Forest (Kuśinagara), the non-dual purport of Vulture Peak, the ultimate fruit of the three bodies in the Suvarṇaprabhāsa and Tongxing, the deep causes of the four stages in the Avataṃsaka and Yingluo, the vast, supreme path of the Pañcaviṃśati-sāhasrikā and Mahāsaṃnipāta, the subtle, esoteric gates of the Sūryagarbha and Candragarbha—that which strings together the heart and marrow of all such scriptures, is it not this treatise alone? Hence the text below says: "Because I desire to encompass comprehensively the vast, deep Dharma and boundless meanings of the Tathāgata, this treatise should be spoken." Since the intention of this treatise is like this, when opened, boundless and immeasurable meanings are its doctrine; when combined, the principles of the two gates and the One Mind are its essentials. The two gates contain myriad meanings without confusion; the boundless meanings are identical with the One Mind, blending together. Therefore, opening and combining are unobstructed; establishing and refuting are unhindered. Opened, it is not cumbersome; combined, it is not narrow. Established, there is nothing gained; refuted, there is nothing lost. This is Aśvaghoṣa's wondrous skill, the essential doctrine of the Awakening of Faith. However, because the purport of this treatise is profound, commentators from the past have rarely grasped its complete doctrine. This is truly because each adhered to what they had practiced and were dragged by the letter, unable to search out the purport with an open mind. Therefore they did not come near the author's intention: some gazed at the source and lost the stream; some grasped the leaves and forgot the trunk; some cut the collar to patch the sleeves; some snapped the branch and tore away the roots. Now I directly rely upon this treatise text, matching it to the sūtra texts it expounds, hoping that those with the same aspiration will reflect upon it. The indication of the essential doctrine is finished.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)

Linked texts (1)