起信論疏筆削記 10.15

10.15

後、果。疏　由前等者，即方便行為能破，生滅相為所破。又方便道為能顯，不生滅性為所顯。此根等者，以未至此位之前，根本無明與真淨心常相和合，成此識相。今至此位，無明既盡，唯一心在，照體獨立，與誰為合？故《中論》云：一法云何合？即顯等者，此中疏意，明今論文隔句顯發，謂破和合識內根本無明生滅之相，即顯不生滅法身本覺，滅染心之中業等相續等相，成淳淨圓智報身始覺。今此且明初段顯法身義，法身即本覺，隱顯得名。今雙舉者，要對後始覺故也。即於等者，以六染心皆依無明與真和合而得相續，今無明既盡，和合不成，染心依何而得相續？故並隨滅。然諸染心皆相妄而體真，故相滅而體不滅，故云不滅心體也。

Second, the result. Commentary: Regarding 'due to the preceding...' and so forth: the expedient practice is that which refutes, and the marks of arising and ceasing are that which is refuted. Furthermore, the path of expedients is that which reveals, and the nature of non-arising and non-ceasing is that which is revealed. Regarding 'this fundamental...' and so forth: before reaching this stage, fundamental ignorance and the truly pure mind are constantly combined, forming these marks of consciousness. Now, having reached this stage, ignorance is exhausted, and only the One Mind remains, its illuminating essence standing alone—with what could it combine? Hence the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā says: 'How could a single dharma combine?' Regarding 'that is, revealing...' and so forth: the commentary's intention here is to explain that the treatise text reveals and discloses across alternating phrases. That is, refuting the marks of arising and ceasing of fundamental ignorance within the composite consciousness immediately reveals the unborn and unceasing dharmakāya of original enlightenment; extinguishing the continuing marks of karma and so forth within the defiled mind accomplishes the actualized enlightenment of the pure, perfect, and all-encompassing cognitive sambhogakāya. Here, this first explains the meaning of revealing the dharmakāya in the first section. The dharmakāya is simply original enlightenment, receiving its name according to concealment or manifestation. Bringing up both now is precisely to contrast it with the subsequent actualized enlightenment. Regarding 'at the...' and so forth: the six defiled minds all rely on ignorance combining with the true to achieve continuation. Now, since ignorance is exhausted and combination does not occur, on what could the defiled mind rely to achieve continuation? Therefore, they all cease along with it. However, all defiled minds are false in their marks but true in their essence; thus, their marks cease but their essence does not cease. Hence it is said: 'without extinguishing the mental essence.'