起信論疏筆削記 10.44

10.44

此約下，二、通妨。或問曰：「次云一切境界悉於中現，云何此言無可現耶？」故此釋通。遍計情有理無，依他相有性無，故知此言無可現者，無妄體故；下云現者，有虛相故。其次云常住一心等，即明依他無體，唯是圓成，則三性之義備矣。

"This is in terms of..." is the second part, resolving objections. Someone might ask: "Next it says that all spheres of experience are manifested within it; why does it say here that there is nothing that can be manifested?" Therefore this explanation resolves it. The parikalpita exists in sentiment but is non-existent in principle; the paratantra exists in marks but is non-existent in nature. Therefore, know that the statement here that "there is nothing that can be manifested" is because of the absence of the essence of delusion; that it says below "manifests" is because of the presence of illusory marks. Below that it says "permanently abiding One Mind, etc.," which clarifies that the paratantra has no essence and is solely the pariniṣpanna; thus the meaning of the three natures is complete.