起信論疏筆削記 6.50

6.50

疏　不可相從者，從，順也。事理別故，其猶水火，敵體相違，豈能互攝？未容等者，若分二別，可言影互相攝。今唯一心，影攝何法？斯則二別亦無攝義，一心亦無攝義也。

[On the Commentary's] "They cannot follow each other": "follow" (從) means to accord with. Because phenomena and principle are distinct, they are like water and fire, diametrically opposed to each other; how could they mutually subsume? [On] "Not allowing..." and so on: if they are divided into two distinct [entities], one could speak of them mutually overshadowing and subsuming. Now there is only the One Mind; what dharma could it overshadow and subsume? This means that if they are two distinct [entities], there is no meaning of subsumption, and if there is [only] the One Mind, there is also no meaning of subsumption.