大乘義章 4.59

4.59

次就果報分別諸根。眼等五根、男女二根，一向是報。信等五根及三無漏根，一向非報。意根一種，通報非根。命根一種，《毘曇》是報，《成實》非報。五受根者，《成實》是報，如彼論說「乃至一切無漏中受，亦皆是報。」若依《毘曇》，除却憂根，餘之四種通報非報，報心俱者說之為報，非報俱者名為非報。憂根一種，一向非報。何故如是？憂根從於想分別生，是故非報。又復憂根，離欲時斷，報法不爾，是故非報。

Next is distinguishing the faculties in terms of karmic retribution. The five faculties of the eye and so forth, and the two faculties of male and female, are purely retribution. The five faculties of faith and so forth, and the three untainted faculties, are purely non-retribution. The single mind faculty encompasses both retribution and non-retribution. Regarding the single life faculty, in the Abhidharma it is retribution, while in the Tattvasiddhi it is non-retribution. As for the five feeling faculties, in the Tattvasiddhi they are retribution, as that treatise says: 'Up to all feelings within the untainted are also all retribution.' According to the Abhidharma, excluding the grief faculty, the other four encompass both retribution and non-retribution: those co-arising with a retribution mind are explained as retribution, while those not co-arising with retribution are designated non-retribution. The single grief faculty is purely non-retribution. Why is this? The grief faculty arises from conceptual discrimination; therefore it is not retribution. Furthermore, the grief faculty is severed upon detachment from desire; retribution dharmas are not like this, and therefore it is not retribution.