肇論新疏 1.208

1.208

如此者，屬前混雜致淳等。既淳既一，豈云異乎？正義至此略周，結歸本題也。初四句結不真，後二句結空可知。雲庵本中失後二句，但有不真之理，缺於空義。今從古本。

"Thus" belongs to the preceding "blend the mixed to achieve the pure" and so on. Being already pure and already one, how could they be called differentiated? The correct doctrine has reached this point in rough completeness, concluding by returning to the original theme. The first four lines conclude with non-truth, and the final two lines conclude with emptiness, as can be known. Yun'an's edition lacks the last two lines, having only the principle of non-truth and lacking the meaning of emptiness. We now follow the ancient edition.