肇論新疏 1.248

1.248

即物示真性真物，假名相皆不立也。《密嚴》云：「二合生分別，名量亦非有。」非真，即題中不真；於何可物，即題中空字。自下依宗廣釋，皆初引教、後依教釋義。文雖各殊，義旨無異。今依論中會釋，或約空色、或依二諦等，一一隨次明之。大要皆約諸法，以明不異第一之真也。

Approaching things to show the true nature and true things, conventional names and characteristics are not established. The Ghanavyūha Sūtra states: "From the union of the two, discrimination arises; names and pramāṇas also do not exist." "Not true" is precisely the "unreal" in the title; "in what sense can they be things" is precisely the word "emptiness" in the title. From here below, it elaborates following the doctrine, in each case first citing the teaching and then explaining the meaning according to the teaching. Although the texts vary, the doctrinal purport is not different. Now, following the synthesis in the treatise, whether in terms of emptiness and form, or based on the two truths, and so forth, it clarifies each in turn. In general, they all rely on all dharmas to clarify that they are not different from the foremost truth.