肇論新疏 2.321

2.321

疏云稱：聖心冥寂理極同無，雖處有名之中，而遠與無名同。斯理之玄，固常所迷昧者矣。以此為懷，自可忘言內得、取定方寸，復何足以人情之異而求聖心之異乎？

Your letter states: 'The sage mind is dark and quiescent, its principle reaching the culmination of identity with non-being; though residing within what has names, it is distantly identical with the nameless. The mystery of this principle is indeed something about which I have always been confused.' Cherishing this within your heart, you can naturally forget words and attain it internally, settling it securely within your own heart; how could it be necessary to seek differences in the sage mind based on the differences in human sentiment?