肇論新疏 2.330

2.330

遣妄執也。言生者，恐妄計云：同非定慧，但定慧生於同內。下遣云，有稱非同，謂有定慧兩名，依名取相，便非同也。若稱生同外者，謂定慧二名同異而出。下復破云，稱非我也。我指同無。無得之般若，焉有同無之外別生定慧之名哉？

This dispels delusive attachments. "Arise" refers to the fear of the deluded calculation: "Identity is not samādhi and wisdom, but samādhi and wisdom arise within identity." Below, it dispels this by saying, "where there is designation there is no identity," meaning that if there are the two designations of samādhi and wisdom, grasping characteristics based on designations, then it is not identity. As for "if the designations arise outside of identity," this means that the two designations of samādhi and wisdom emerge distinct from identity. Below, it refutes this again: "the designations do not pertain to me." "Me" refers to identity with non-being. For prajñā that is without attainment, how could there be designations of samādhi and wisdom arising separately outside of identity with non-being?