肇論新疏 2.398

2.398

承上經意，以所照空有二而不二，答能照之心二智一體。群情下，亦會違。何故？亦有說云：真俗迢然，二智各照也。釋云：由群情（云云）。玄籍者，指前所引之經。真偽是心、空有是境，偽目權智。

Carrying forward the sūtra's meaning above, because the illuminated emptiness and existence are two yet not two, he answers that the illuminating mind has two cognitions of one substance. From "Because the dispositions..." onward also harmonizes contradictions. Why? There are also statements saying: Ultimate and conventional are distinctly separated, and the two cognitions each illuminate one. The explanation says: due to the dispositions of beings (and so on). "Profound scriptures" refers to the sūtras cited previously. Real and provisional pertain to the mind; emptiness and existence pertain to the realm; "provisional" designates upāya-jñāna.