肇論新疏 3.123
肇論新疏 3.123
- Language
- Classical Chinese
3.123
奪也。前是權寂立教之意，未是玄寂絕言之致。無相故玄，無名故寂。前是隱顯之跡，亦非環中之妙。環中之妙，豈容隱顯？
This is a refutation. What preceded was the intent of establishing the teachings through expedient quiescence, not yet the purport of profound quiescence that cuts off words. Being animitta, it is profound; being nameless, it is quiescent. What preceded was the traces of concealing and revealing, nor is it the marvel within the ring. How could the marvel within the ring allow concealing and revealing?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation