肇論新疏 3.294

3.294

初二句明相即無異。此非下，以相即故非異，非異故冥會，誰云其異而乖於冥會耶？以未盡故有三，誰云異亦無三？血脈隱微，可細推繹。

The first two lines clarify that being identical, they are not different. From "This is not" onwards: because they are identical they are not different, and because they are not different they profoundly commune—who says they are different and conflict with profound communion? Because they have not exhausted it there are three—who says that if they are different there are also no three? The thread of reasoning is subtle and delicate; it may be carefully deduced.