大乘法苑義林章 5.13

5.13

二辨體者，其五蘊性唯是有為，以積聚故。《俱舍論》云「蘊不攝無為，義不相應故。」又《毘曇》云「陰是死法，唯攝有為。」三性之中依他性。談有法故，非遍計所執。通無漏故，亦圓成實。五法之內，體即前四，唯除如如。十二處、十八界，通以有為無為為體，總攝五法及以二性，除遍計所執性，以無體故。

Second, distinguishing their substantial nature: the nature of the five aggregates is exclusively conditioned, because they are accumulations. The *Kośabhāṣya* states: 'The aggregates do not subsume the unconditioned, because the meaning does not apply.' Furthermore, the *Abhidharma* states: '*Yin* are phenomena subject to death; they only subsume the conditioned.' Among the three natures, they are the paratantra-svabhāva. Because they speak of existent phenomena, they are not the parikalpita-svabhāva. Because they extend to the anāsrava, they are also the pariniṣpanna-svabhāva. Among the five dharmas, their substantial nature consists of the first four, excluding only suchness. The twelve bases and eighteen realms generally take both the conditioned and unconditioned as their substantial nature; they comprehensively subsume the five dharmas and the two natures, excluding the parikalpita-svabhāva, because it lacks substantial nature.