大乘法苑義林章 7.16

7.16

三有異無異門。《攝大乘》說「諸佛法身、依止、意樂、業無別故，當言無異。無量依身現等覺故，當言有異。」無性釋言「真如無異、依止無別、利樂意同、意樂無別，正覺涅槃種種業同，業無差別。」此說能依及所依同，故言無異。《佛地論》說「法身實性諸佛共有，故無差別。就能證因有差別故，假說差別。」唯就所依說無差別，體無二故。若就能依說有差別，體有異故。《攝論》復言「如說法身，受用亦爾，意樂及業無差別故，當言無異。不由依止無差別故，無量依止差別轉故。變化身亦爾。」《佛地論》說「其餘二身，各別因感，各別自性實有差別。」即《攝論》言「無量依身現等覺故，當言有異。但無別執，利樂意樂事業平等，說無差別。」亦不相違。

Third is the section on difference and non-difference. The Mahāyānasaṃgraha states: 'Because the dharmakāyas, supports, intentions, and activities of all Buddhas have no distinction, they should be declared non-different. Because they manifest equal awakening through immeasurable supportive bodies, they should be declared different.' Asvabhāva explains: 'Tathatā is non-different, the support has no distinction, the intention to bring welfare and joy is identical, the intentions have no distinction, and the various activities of perfect enlightenment and nirvāṇa are identical, so their activities have no distinction.' This states that the supported and the supporting are identical, hence it is said to be non-different. The Buddhabhūmy-upadeśa states: 'The true nature of the dharmakāya is shared by all Buddhas, and therefore has no distinction. Only with respect to the causes that realize it are there distinctions, so distinctions are metaphorically spoken of.' Only with respect to the support is it said to have no distinction, because its essence is non-dual. If with respect to what relies on it, it is said to have distinctions, because their substances are different. The Mahāyānasaṃgraha further states: 'Just as it is said of the dharmakāya, the enjoyment [body] is also likewise: because intentions and activities have no distinction, they should be declared non-different. It is not because the supports have no distinction, for they operate through immeasurable distinctions of support. The transformation body is also likewise.' The Buddhabhūmy-upadeśa states: 'The other two bodies are brought about by distinct causes and their distinct natures are truly different.' This is just what the Mahāyānasaṃgraha says: 'Because they manifest equal awakening through immeasurable supportive bodies, they should be declared different. But with no separate grasping, their intentions and activities of welfare and joy are equal, so they are spoken of as non-different.' These are likewise not in contradiction.