華嚴經義海百門 1.145
華嚴經義海百門 1.145
- Language
- Classical Chinese
1.145
義海百門者,賢首國師宗別教一乘所製也。囊括大經、發揮玄旨,總十門而析百義、融萬法而歸一塵。嗟乎!吾祖之訓,遺文尚存,莫有傳者。晉水法𧜟 淨源,字伯長,苦志于茲有年數矣。遂遍搜古本,歷考十門,以前之九門具彰序意,列義通結唯後之一門。亡其通結,或諸本傳寫闕文耶?或祖師立言互略耶?抑又第六差別顯現誤題圓明解縛者?蓋後人橫議編簡異同,今偕詳定,以第六至第十通前五門合為一卷。恐來者不知,故直書以見其意。時熈寧二年歲次己酉四月十九日,於青墩寶閣講院方丈序。
The Hundred Gates to the Sea of Meanings was composed by National Preceptor Xianshou based on the distinctive teaching of the ekayāna. It encapsulates the great sūtra, elucidates the profound purport, gathers the ten gates to analyze the hundred meanings, and fuses the myriad dharmas to return them to a single dust mote. Alas! The instructions of our ancestor and his surviving writings still remain, yet none transmits them. The Dharma-descendant from Jinshui, Jingyuan, courtesy name Bochang, has toiled with determination in this for many years. He then searched everywhere for ancient manuscripts, examining each of the ten gates. The preceding nine gates fully displayed the introductory intent and laid out the meanings with a general conclusion, yet only the final gate lacked its general conclusion. Was it that various copies omitted text in transcription? Or did the ancestral master mutually abbreviate his phrasing? Or, furthermore, was the sixth, "Manifestation of Differences," mistakenly titled "Complete Illumination of Untying Bonds"? These are arbitrary opinions of later people regarding the discrepancies in the bamboo slips. Now, having thoroughly settled them, I have combined the sixth through the tenth together with the preceding five gates into one fascicle. Fearing that future generations might not know this, I record it directly to show its intent. On the nineteenth day of the fourth month in the jiyou year, the second year of the Xining era [1069 CE], prefaced in the Abbot's quarters of the Lecture Cloister of the Precious Pavilion at Qingtun.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation