止觀輔行傳弘決 6.4

6.4

次正修觀推。因成中亦先例四句。「若從」下，用觀推。「四句」下，斷惑證真結成二空。「無欲」性空，「無句」相空。「利根」下，結利鈍根二行不同。利根二行，如上破見中說。上根之人破有見竟即得入真，若未相應亦須用於六十四番。從「設未」下，明六十四番。「若鈍」下，標相續示觀法，例因成說。次二空中云「四句無欲」即性空，「亦無於四」即相空。前破見中破三假後各結二空，此中一一假後亦皆結無生及以二空，文異意同。「初品」下，明餘品亦有三假，例初品說。「破貪」下，餘使亦例。「九品」下，結成無生破遍也。

Next, directly cultivating the contemplation to investigate: in causal composition, it also first uses the four propositions as a model. From 'If from...', downward, one applies the contemplation to investigate. From 'Four propositions...', downward, severing delusions and realizing truth is concluded as the two emptinesses. 'Free from desire' is the emptiness of nature; 'free from the propositions' is the emptiness of marks. From 'Sharp faculties...', downward, concludes the difference between the two practices of sharp and dull faculties. The two practices of sharp faculties are as explained above in refuting views. A person of superior faculties, having refuted the view of existence, immediately enters truth; if not yet in resonance, they must also use the sixty-four variations. From 'Supposing one has not yet...', downward, clarifies the sixty-four variations. From 'If dull...', downward, marks continuity to show the method of contemplation, modeled on the explanation of causal composition. Next, in the two emptinesses, it says: 'the four propositions are free from desire' is the emptiness of nature; 'also free from the four' is the emptiness of marks. Previously, in refuting views, each of the three provisionalities was concluded with the two emptinesses; here, after each and every provisionality, non-arising and the two emptinesses are likewise concluded—the wording differs, but the meaning is the same. From 'The first grade...', downward, clarifies that the remaining grades also have three provisionalities, modeled on the explanation of the first grade. From 'Refuting lust...', downward, the remaining underlying defilements are also modeled in the same way. From 'The nine grades...', downward, concludes the universal refutation of non-arising.