釋禪波羅蜜次第法門 1.159

1.159

復次，若謂有漏之法，自有有漏法；若有漏之法由有漏心故，有有漏法；若有漏法由法由心故，有有漏法；若有漏之法不由法不由心故，有有漏法。如此之計，皆墮邪見。所以者何？若謂由有漏法故，有有漏法者，即是自性有漏法。若是自性有漏法，則應有無窮之漏法，以自性復有自性故。今實不爾。若謂有漏法不能自有，由有漏心故有者，即是他性有漏法。所以者何？若有漏法待有漏心為自性者，今有漏心待有漏法，豈非他性？若由他性而有有漏法者，他性若是有有漏法，則有漏法還是有漏法，更無心法之別；他性若非有漏法，非有漏法何能有有漏法？故知有漏法不由有漏心故有。若謂有漏法由有漏法、有漏心故有者，即是共有。若是共有，則從自、他性中而有有漏法。若爾，則一時應有二有漏法。今實不然，故知非自、他、共故有有漏法。

Furthermore, if one claims that defiled dharmas have defiled dharmas from themselves; or that because of defiled mind, defiled dharmas exist; or that because of both dharma and mind, defiled dharmas exist; or that not because of dharma and not because of mind, defiled dharmas exist—such assumptions all fall into wrong views. Why is this? If one claims that because of defiled dharmas there are defiled dharmas, this would be an intrinsic nature of defiled dharmas. If there were an intrinsic nature of defiled dharmas, then there would be endless defiled dharmas, because an intrinsic nature would have another intrinsic nature. Now in reality, this is not so. If one claims that defiled dharmas cannot exist from themselves and exist because of defiled mind, this would be an extrinsic nature of defiled dharmas. Why is this? If a defiled dharma relies on defiled mind for its intrinsic nature, then now defiled mind relies on defiled dharma—how could that not be an extrinsic nature? If a defiled dharma exists because of an extrinsic nature, then if the extrinsic nature is a defiled dharma, the defiled dharma remains a defiled dharma, and there is no distinction between mind and dharma; if the extrinsic nature is not a defiled dharma, how could that which is not a defiled dharma have a defiled dharma? Therefore we know that defiled dharmas do not exist because of defiled mind. If one claims that defiled dharmas exist because of defiled dharmas and defiled mind, this would be shared existence. If it is shared existence, then defiled dharmas exist from both intrinsic and extrinsic nature. If so, then two defiled dharmas should exist simultaneously. Now in reality, this is not so; therefore we know that defiled dharmas do not exist from self, from other, or from both combined.