釋禪波羅蜜次第法門 1.163

1.163

當知有漏之法於因成、相續、相待中各各四句求畢竟不可得。若不可得，云何分別有有漏法？若無有有漏之法而說有漏法者，當知但有名字，是中不應定有所依，生諸戲論，破智慧眼。次明有漏心亦如是，若有漏法心如是，餘三句法心亦如是，但以世間名字故，說名字之法不在內、外、兩中間，亦不常，自有無名之名，故曰假名。

One should know that when seeking defiled dharmas through each of the four propositions within causal formation, continuity, and relativity, they are ultimately unattainable. If they are unattainable, how can one distinguish that defiled dharmas exist? If without there being defiled dharmas one speaks of defiled dharmas, one should know that there are only names; herein one should not definitely have a basis of reliance, giving rise to various conceptual proliferations and destroying the eye of wisdom. Next, explaining defiled mind is also like this. If defiled dharma and mind are like this, the remaining three propositions of dharma and mind are also like this. It is only by means of mundane names that one speaks of dharmas of name; they do not exist within, without, or in between the two, nor are they permanent; they naturally possess nameless names, and hence are called provisional names.